*




You are watching: Why we are afraid a 1400 year secret

*

*



See more: Why Do Large Algae Have A Holdfast? ? What Part Of A Plant Is The Hold Fast

http://www.politicalislam.com More videos here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0Uu...For a variation via English Subtitles: http://www.mrctv.org/videos/bill-warn...The background of Islam in Europe and also how it impacts us to this particular day. This is a background based on numbers and facts that you may not watch all over else and also defines why we might be afraid to see Islam for what it is based on its very own doctrine and also practice.


Banned in some countries. A UK seasoned history author attempts to find archaeological proof for the alleged Arabian Prophet of Islam external of the Qur"an/Hadiths having actually accessibility to latest findings, venturing to the lands in question seeking difficult crucial historical proof. Also, R. Spencer"s book "Did Muhammad Exist?" review; "Essentially, Spencer maintains that the Arabia realm came initially, the theology came later on." He concludes: "A cautious examination makes at least one point clear: The details of Muhammad"s life that have been handed dvery own as canonical—that he linked Arabia by the force of arms, concluded alliances, married wives, legislated for his neighborhood, and did so much else—are a creation of political ferment dating from long after the moment he is meant to have lived. Similarly, the records strongly indicate that the Qur"an did not exist until long after it was meant to have been ceded to the prophet of Islam." "Did Muhammad exist? As a prophet of the Arabs who taught a vaguely identified monotheism, he may have existed. But beyond that, his life story is shed in the mists of legend, like those of Robin Hood & Macbeth. As the prophet of Islam, that got (or also claimed to receive) the perfect copy of the perfect eternal book from the supreme God, Muhammad practically absolutely did not exist. Tbelow are too many type of gaps, also many silences, too many type of aspects of the historic document that ssuggest do not accord, and also cannot be made to accord, through the conventional account of the Arabian prophet teaching his Qur"an, energizing his followers to such an level that they went out and dominated a great component of the people." (pp.214-215)How will Muslims respond to this book? Some may look for to curse the author. They may respond in outrage. But that will not disprove the facts presented here. Islam is supposed to be a faith based in history. It is meant to be a religion of factor. But if history will certainly not support the claims of Islam, is it time for Muslims to rethink the legitimacy of Islam? Blind commitment to the teachings of the local imam will not be sufficient in this age of prompt indevelopment and confirmation of facts" http://www.answering-islam.org/writer...Tom Holland"s response to criticism of his documentary; https://tinyurl.com/ybeuwcrhKeep in mind by A2T-DoJtC: In SyroAramaic which a lot of Arabic comes out of, the word "Muhammad" is not a correct name however an honourable title "The Praised/Anointed One”, a SyroAramaic title referral to "The Christ" of the Scriptures in Syria + vicinity indisputably prrange by historic evidence then it would certainly have actually of an Arab Prophet unable to be discovered exterior of the Qu"ran/Hadiths minus a few spurious resources from MONKS (massive hint) unable to be corroborated/verified by other contemporaneous resources satisfactorily, for this reason being pseudopigraphica"s based in Mystery Religions, thereby being suspect regarding grave error in translation expertise either by deliberate tool for men’s desire to dominate the civilization or because of basic illiteracy of such populaces of these times in such areas which would certainly have aided significantly in dispersing the erroneous translation interpretation. Is the circa 1306+ year old story of an "Arab Prophet" developed on hoswarm background or is it a corrupted version of assorted astro-polytheistic pagan & heathen nature religious beliefs of southern Mesopotamia linked w/ certain corrupted versions of Biblical stories adopted by the Arab mind therefore being interpreted in a philosophical, mystic, heathen conmessage w/ just touches of Abrahamic chronicles when viewed with the lens of verifiable history? For the student whom diligently, rigorously looks for & studies factual ancient/classic history, digs also deeper, they"ll uncover Islam"s monotheistic place begins once Constantinople "Christianity" (OT & NT) has actually already been in the very same areas because circa mid 3rd century A.D. seeking converts. Could modern-day Islam be a Roman-Greco Byzantine cult that can be dubbed "Arabian Arianism" intermingled subsequently w/ assorted anti-biblical ideologies/religions of various flavours which RomanGreco "Christianity" basically is depending upon wright here it is in the civilization as in the instance of Islam, for this reason providing Islam it"s begin roughly 700ADVERTISEMENT (main proof, not tradition) w/ eerie ideas being exactly how carefully the head-dress of an Islamic womales and also Roguy & Constantinople nun"s extending is for example? Or is Islam a much more nefarious strategy by Rome"s Mystery Religion agents via murder & suppression of true background among various other points to usage as a fierce attack dog for decimating the human being population, as is already arising in order to usher in a One World Order?In the above documentary, some either understand an "Arabian Prophet" is myth right into fact and also are being dishocolony, or they are unconscious of such proof. Did a supposed "Arabian Prophet" via the alleged "name" of "Muhammad" actually exist, or is this really a synagogue of satan Romano-Iudeo deception?