You are watching: Who is the protagonist in 12 angry men
After being sequestered in the jurors" room, twelve jurymales are initially asked to vote upon a verdict on the Hispanic boy who has actually indicted for the murder of his father. The guard having locked them inside, the men take a vote upon the verdict of this young defendant. The vote...
Start your 48-hour free trial to unlock this answer and also thousands even more. Enjoy slrfc.org ad-complimentary and also cancel anytime.
After being sequestered in the jurors" room, twelve juryguys are initially asked to vote upon a verdict on the Hispanic boy who has indicted for the murder of his father. The guard having locked them inside, the guys take a vote upon the verdict of this young defendant. The vote is 10-1 "guilty"; Juror 8 has voted not guilty just because he has reasonable doubt and feels that the defendant deserves their close examicountry and also discussion of the proof. Clat an early stage he is the protagonist, who desires justice for the defendant.
THREE. Somebody’s in left area. (To EIGHT) You think he’s not guilty?EIGHT (quietly). I don’t know.THREE. I never witnessed a guiltier male in my life. You sat right in court and also heard the exact same point I did. The man’s a dangerous killer. You might view it.EIGHT. He’s nineteen years old.THREE. That’s old sufficient. He knifed his very own father. Four inches right into the chest. An innocent nineteen-year-old kid. They verified it a dozen different means. Do you desire me to list them?EIGHT. No.TEN (to EIGHT). Well, do you think his story?EIGHT. I don’t recognize whether I think it or not. Maybe I don’t.SEVEN. So what’d you vote not guilty for?EIGHT. Tbelow were elalso votes for guilty. It’s not so straightforward for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking around it initially.
Juror 3 is incredibly opinionated; he is likewise accustomed to forcing his wishes upon others. He is the antagonist. At one allude he says,
THREE: It’s these kids – the way they are nowadays. When I was a kid I offered to call my father, ‘Sir.’ That’s ideal. ‘Sir.’ You ever hear a kid call his father that anymore?
At another point in Act II, as tright here is a secret vote without Juror 8 and one guy votes guilty, Juror 3 needs to know who has readjusted his vote. Juror 11 opposes his bullying of the others.
THREE. Hold it? We’re trying to put a guilty male into the chair wbelow he belongs—and every one of a sudden we’re paying attention to fairy tales.
Anvarious other juror who is antagonistic is Juror Ten. He is a bigoted guy who holds that the defendant committed the crime bereason he is among those kind of delinquents from the inner city. He, also, opposes the attempts of Juror 8 to disprove the defendant"s guilt. In Act III, as soon as Juror 3 argues against the defendant, saying that he has actually told his father that he was going to kill him, Juror 10 interrupts:
TEN. And exactly how they expect it!EIGHT. Well, let me ask you this. Do you really think the boy would shout out a point choose that so the whole neighborhood would hear it? I don’t think so. He’s much too bright for that.
See more: Why Do People Use Autism As An Insult : Harmless Or Hateful?
TEN (exploding). Bright! He’s a prevalent, ignorant slob. He don’t also speak great English. (Ironically, neither does he)
But, ultimately Juror 10 is defeated as is Juror 3, and also the males realize that tbelow is reasonable doubt. As such, they cannot in great conscientific research, convict the boy.