Sounds prefer a quote from The Matrix doesn’t it? Well, that’s bereason it is (or was). It’s what Morpheus states to Neo once telling him that the truth he sees, is not fact at all. He is actually living in a simulation.

You are watching: What if i told you everything you knew was a lie

While the plot of The Matrix may sound pretty far-fetched, there’s a prospering team of scientists, physicists and also thinkers that believe it could be uncomfortably cshed to the fact.

The Simulation Argument

The simulation argument was initially popularised by Nick Bostrom in 2003. In his post Are We Living in a Computer Simulation? Bostrom presented three hypotheses, one being “we are almost definitely living in a computer simulation”.

Yes, you review that properly. ALMOST CERTAINLY.

Bostrom’s discussion rests mainly on the huge theoretical computer power that future, “posthuman” civilisations could possess. They can be qualified of points we could not currently fathom.

While the idea may sound a little like the ramblings of a fringe group of mad philosopers, it has actually the backing of some extremely respected heavy-hitters. Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tykid and also Tesla boss Elon Musk both think we are more likely than not in a simulation.

And with a little of digging you can discover plenty of proof to assistance this hypothesis.


We have The Sims. Does an additional being have actually “The Humans”? Credit: Kirrha by means of Flickr

Technological development

The factor for the simulation argument’s current re-appearance is mostly due to the popularity of online (VR) and also augmented truth (AR). These modern technologies have advanced so quickly in current years that we normally start to wonder of their future potential.

Could they eventually end up being so immersive and also realistic that we cannot sepaprice them from reality? If so, who’s to say this hasn’t already happened? And if this has actually currently occurred, who’s to say we are not in among these universes?


Neil deGrasse Tyson summed up the hereditary argument to support the simulation hypothesis in last years Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate. He points out our vastly superior intellect compared to primates, despite the truth we share 98% of our DNA.

Is it naïve to believe there’s not a being only slightly various to us genetically however whose intelligence would certainly make us look choose chimpanzees, or “drooling, blithering idiots” as deGrassse Tyson puts it?

If this is the situation, and our species is currently dabbling with digital realities and man-made knowledge, have the right to we comprehfinish what these beings may be technologically qualified of? An entirely simulated universe perhaps?


A final discussion for the simulation hypothesis comes from the incredible explanatory power of math. Many type of things we recognize around the universe are described by maths. Gravity, the Big Bang, the speed of light, all of these abide by mathematical rules. Mathematics additionally appears to set borders to our universe.

You understand what else is bound by maths? Computers and video games. Could it be that maths explains our world so well because our universe is nopoint more than a computer program?


Are we no even more than a collection of letters and numbers? Credit: Kjetil Korslien via Flickr

Does it matter?

The simulation discussion raises a lot of inquiries. Upon rebrowsing this topic I certainly have even more questions than answers. But the last question I always come earlier to is does it also matter?

Tright here is no means to tell if we are in a simulation because, if every little thing we’ve ever known has actually been simulated, we’d have actually no idea of what reality is. The simulation would certainly be our fact.

See more: Which Of The Following Is Not A Difference Between Dna And Rna?

And in the end, if this is a simulation, then hats off to its creator because I think this universe is pretty incredible.